Sunday, November 14, 2010

The Touro Communication Club Notes - #128–November 17, 2010
Contents:
1. Eight Quotes about Music by Maurice Ravel and 2 poets, one saxophonist and one philosopher.
2. UPCOMING CLUB PROGRAM: - “Critical Listening Institute: Ravel’s ‘Bolero’”
Wednesday, November 17, 2010 @ 2 pm in Room 2233.
3. Logical Fallacy of the Week # 18 – “Misleading Vividness”
4. Professor Geo’s “Communication Thought of the Week”
5. Note to Communicators: “Listening to Music”
6. .NEXT WEEK’S TOPIC: “Talking to Guys/Talking to Girls””
7. Upcoming Conversations - please add your topic to the list
8. What happened last week: ““Money”


1. Four Quotes about Music by Maurice Ravel
“The only love affair I have ever had was with music.”
“Music, I feel, must be emotional first and intellectual second.”
“I begin by considering an effect.”
“I did my work slowly, drop by drop, I tore it out of me by pieces.”
Four Quotes about Music
“Without music, life would be a mistake.”
Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche (1844-1900), 19th century German philosopher
“Music was my refuge. I could craw into the space between the notes and curl my back to loneliness.”
Maya Angelou, (b. 1928), American writer and poet, author “Father Together in My Name

“Music is your own experience, your thoughts, your wisdom. If you don’t live it, it won’t come out of your horn.”
Charlie Parker, (1920-1955), ”Bird” was an American Jazz saxophonist and composer.
“Music rots when it gets too far from the dance. Poetry atrophies when it gets too far from music.
Ezra Pound (1885-1972), American expatriate poet and critic


2. The Touro Communication Club
Wednesday, November 17, 2010 - 2 pm – Room 223 – Midtown
Critical Listening Institute II – Maurice Ravel’s “Bolero”


In this second session of our effort to sharpen our listening skills, we turn to a famous piece of music, a one-movement orchestral piece by French composer Maurice Ravel, premiered in 1928. “Bolero” gained universal attention when it was commandeered for the 1979 Blake Edwards film comedy, “10” starring Dudley Moore, Bo Derek and Julie Andrews. We are going to listen to the piece twice, once for a general impression followed by a discussion. Then we close with a second hearing. It should be fun to understand how the structure of this particular piece of music created such notoriety.

Last spring, the first Critical Listening Institute program was on Martin Luther King’s “I Have a Dream” speech. The third Critical Listening Institute program will be on Abbott and Costello’s “Who’s On First’ routine.


3. Logical Fallacy of the Week #18:
“Misleading Vividness”

Although this is technically not a “logical’ fallacy, it gives evidence of how our brain works. We are drawn to the shiniest objects. We are draw to the prettiest person or thing. We are drawn to the most sensational visual effect. Fireworks always draw a crowd. Vividness is a magnet for our eyes and ear.

And we are fooled.- often. :”All that glistens is not gold,” Shakespeare reminds us in “The Merchant of Venice.” Yet we still are magnetized by the package. People come out of a movie stunned by the visual effects. Who cares about the plot or characters? Great effects = a great movie. We come out of the theatre, whistling the scenic effects.

The fallacy points out how we are affected by sensation. We buy a newspaper for its sensational headline. Celebrity gossip tells us that pretty people have problems, too. As the holiday season appears, the child in us imagines a pretty experience, yet many of us have memories of difficult times during a holiday season.

We learn to “fake until you make it.” So we “Dress for Success” and we learn that we have nothing to say when we open our mouth. The pretty box is empty inside.
Political rhetoric of the campaign is always suspect.. The candidate wants to be elected so he/she speaks inflated poetry. We want our latest political savior to come on his white steed and sweep down a rescue us from jaws of reality.

As long as we recognize our child-like aspirations are just wish-fulfillment, we can operate in a world of sugar plum fairies just so long.. We have to keep in mind, “Fool me once shame on me; fool me twice shame on you.” But then I have to recognize the carnival mirror image as it happens. Sometimes it’s hard and we can get fooled – again.

.
4. Professor Geo’s “Communication Thought of the Week #6:
Ernest Hemingway comments, “When people talk, listen completely. Most people never listen.”

5. .A Note to Communicators:

“Listening to Music”
I spent nearly a decade in the music department of the University of Buffalo, doing opera - producing, directing, designing, building and painting scenery, designing and hanging lights and sweeping the theatre. I was a misfit. I was a theatre person, not a musician. I tried to absorb the ethos of what a classical musician is and does. I hung and focused the lights for famous musicians and watched them perform and argue among themselves. I inhaled music.

On the subway and on the street, I watch people nodding their heads or humming along to their iPods. I can only guess how people listen to music with their iPods because I don’t have one and don’t want one. What I think most people do with their iPods is to let the sound wash over them, engulf them, letting the sound transport them to another plane.

I am the opposite. My theatre and opera experience has conditioned me not to “appreciate” music, but rather to study it as I listen to it. What are the instruments playing now? What is time signature? What are the musical themes and their pattern of repetition? What is the range of the acoustical and rhythmic dynamics? How is the piece constructed to achieve the effect the composer seems to be trying to achieve? My mind is never quiet.

The matter of “like” and “dislike” in music – and most of the arts – is irrelevant. I am working as I listen though no one is likely to be aware of what I am doing inside my head.

I don’t mean to imply that I don’t get absorbed with music. I do. However, that emotional absorption is never complete; my mind is always operating analytically to some degree all the time.

Why should you or anyone care how I listen to music? What I do is ultimately of no concern to you. You are interested in you. I offer this brief reflection on what happens when I listen to music because there might be someone out there that listens to music – or any arrangement of sound – in a different manner.

Please comment.


6. Next week’s Conversation:
Wednesday. November 24. 2010 – Room 223 – Midtown
“Talking to Guys/Talking to Girls”

In the last four years, we’ve talked about this topic at least three times in one form or another. The academic term for conversation between the sexes is “Gender Communication.” John Gray’s 1992 bestseller “Men are from Mars; Women are from Venus” codified the communication difficulties between the sexes in the popular mind. For centuries, the conflict has been called ‘The Battle of the Sexes.” Going beyond sexual attraction to attempt building a relationship is an ongoing challenge for everyone. Some have answers. Other are searching. We’ll share our questions and conclusions.


7. UPCOMING CONVERSATIONS:
What about one of these topics?
“Repetition”
“Meaning”
“Why Does History Repeat Itself?”
“Heroism”
“Concentration”
“Coping with Adversity”
Student Poetry showcase
“Empathy”
“Connecting the Dots”
Role play of Cynical people
“Cold Calling in Sales
“He’s Just Not That into You”
Critical Listening Institute III: “Abbott & Costello’s ‘Who’s On First?’”
“Criticism – Giving and Receiving”
“Logical Fallacies”
“Freedom II”
“Gender Communication II”
“SPAR Debate”
“Distraction II”
“Negotiation II”
“Imagination II”
“Rodney King: ‘Can’t We Just Get Along?’ II”
“Political Savvy”
“Emotions: Anger II”
“Capitalism and Socialism”
“Illusions”
“Parenting”
And dozens of others!

Compare the notice of the session with what really happened!
8. What happened on Wednesday, November 10, 2010?
“Money”

Expect this topic to promote lots of heat. Although money is often invisible in many of our daily activities, its presence or lack of it can provoke the most extreme human behavior. Money can be a measure of self-esteem, a tool for measuring accomplishment, a springboard for greed, a sacrament of poverty, a replacement for love, and on and on. Everyone has a different relationship to money which may be conscious or not. Let’s start the discussion with “The love of money is the root of all evil.”


An exciting new group of students found the topic attractive. Maybe they thought there would be free samples. They included Braudlee Dupuy, Roberto Moel (sp?) and Ladaya Thomas. Robert Gilmore, Peter Bryan and Jamal James had joined us for the Jazz film. Among the familiar faces were Myrtho Leon, Moche Bengio, Miriam Sanor, Gary Sheinfield, Charles Mason, Lorinda Moore, Carlisle Yearwood and Hal Wicke.

The entire discussion was quite spirited with everyone offering their viewpoints and disagreeing in a professional manner. As usual, Hal asked what money meant to each person.

· Money is a necessity.
· “I need it all.”
· “I want a lavish style of living.”
· There is an emotional attachment to money.
· “I have a debate in my mind all the time about money. Should I spend? Why not?”
· “I have money worries.”
· “Money is just paper. I worked in a bank and money is just money. It doesn’t stand for anything.”
· “The value of money is in your mind.”
· “Money is the accept system in America. There is 5% poverty world wide.
· “Money is a way to exchange goods.
· “Money = stability.”
· “As long as I have $3000 cash in my pocket, I feel okay.”
· “No money, no happiness.”
· Moche: “In France there is less money than now. Everything has been
Americanized.”
· “In America, you need money.”
· “You want money to be happy.”
· Money represents more than money itself – it represents value
· America is so materialistic.
· Everyone is right – the collective need vs. the individual desires.
· “Money is not going to buy happiness.”
· “Money can buy the illusion of happiness. You want more things.”
· Gary – “When you talk about money, you talk about everything.”

How many of you are “money driven”?
Yes – 3
No – 5

· Robert - “I don’t need money. I have a free public library card.”
The discussion followed a number of directions – masks, scheming for money, symbols of success, individual greed, demands of society, what’s reality?, etc.

· “Why can’t you be you?” Without masks – between 2 worlds
· Money as evil.
· Money clouds the mind.
· “The minority culture does not support itself.”

Tyler Perry’s new film “For Colored Girls” is an important film and different from his previous films.
---
We always have a great time exploring these issues. So often our daily life never focuses on these Communication issues. If you have something you want us to discuss please let us know and we’ll add it to the list.

Next time bring a friend. The Communication Club is always an open discussion, limited only by time. Everyone gets a chance to speak. All opinions are welcome. Here is an opportunity for students to challenge professors’ views outside the class without any homework or assignments. You just have to show up and listen and talk if you want.

Hal Wicke

Sunday, November 7, 2010

The Touro Communication Club Notes - #127–November 10, 2010
Contents:
1. Ten Quotes about “Money”
2. UPCOMING CLUB PROGRAM: - “Money”
Wednesday, November 10, 2010 @ 2 pm in Room 223
3. Logical Fallacy of the Week # 17 – “The False Dilemma”
4. Professor Geo’s “Communication Thought of the Week”
5. Note to Communicators: “Money Issues”
6. .NEXT WEEK’S TOPIC Critical Listening Institute: Ravel’s “Bolero”
7. Upcoming Conversations - please add your topic to the list
8. What happened last week: ““Midterm Elections”


1. Ten Quotes about Money

“Money was never a big motivation for me, except as a way to keep score. The real excitement is playing the game.”
Donald Trump, author, “Trump: Art of the Deal,” American real estate developer
My problem lies in reconciling my gross habits with my net income.”
Errol Flynn (1909-1959), Hollywood movie actor
“Lack of money is the root of all evil.”
George Bernard Shaw (1856-1950), Irish playwright and socialist
“For the love of money is the root of all evil.”
1 Timothy 6:10, New Testament, The Bible, King James’ version
“Money frees you from doing things you dislike. Since I dislike doing nearly everything,
money is handy.”
Groucho Marx (1890-1977), actor, comedian with the Marx Brothers
“Money can’t buy happiness, but neither can poverty.”
Leo Rosten (1908-1997), Jewish humorist and Yiddish lexicographer
“Money makes the world go round.”
Song lyric from 1966 musical “Cabaret”, book by Joe Masteroff, music and lyrics by
John Kander and Fred Ebb, later made into a film.
“Money is better than poverty, if only for financial reasons.”
Woody Allen, American comedian and filmmaker
“Money often costs too much.”


2. The Touro Communication Club
Wednesday, November 10, 2010 - 2 pm – Room 223 – Midtown
“Money”

Expect this topic to promote lots of heat. Although money is often invisible in many of our daily activities, its presence or lack of it can provoke the most extreme human behavior. Money can be a measure of self-esteem, a tool for measuring accomplishment, a springboard for greed, a sacrament of poverty, a replacement for love, and on and on. Everyone has a different relationship to money which may be conscious or not. Let’s start the discussion with “The love of money is the root of all evil.”


3. Logical Fallacy of the Week #17:
“False Dilemma”

You’ve no doubt heard this sneaky fallacy during the recent Midterm elections. You’ve probably heard it used in an argument where the emotions are so high that reason doesn’t have a chance to breathe.

“Am I right or wrong?” “I can either cheat or fail the exam.” “S/he didn’t treat me right so I stole his/her money.” “If I don’t leap a tall building at a single bound, I’m a failure.” “My way or the highway.”

The dichotomy derives from black and white thinking. For this person, there are only two options: yes/no, good/bad, success/failure; light/dark, on/off, beautiful/ugly, either/or. B&W thinking simplifies life: You don’t have to worry about grays. Everything is one way or the other. Nothing is nuanced.

As the media noise increases in American political elections, the politicians must try to break through the din to reach the voter. Simple wins. Complex loses. Bumper sticker thinking works because people remember “simple.’ Like students in class, voters zone out with complex ideas.
The False Dilemma is the perfect tool for creating instant voter response for or against an issue by reducing complex ideas to only two options which are often misrepresentations of the actual situation. Arguments about cutting Social Security, Medicare and the national debt are fraught with False Dilemmas to enhance one position over another.

The same fallacy is often used by parents to give their children a false choice: “Either you eat your dinner or you get smacked.” “Be quiet or I’ll give you something to cry about.” The child does not have the reasoning skills yet to neutralize parental authority and since parents are physically larger than children, the fear of unknown consequences forces the child to obey.
To allow more options than two forced by the False Dilemma, you need to be calm and understand that most of the time, life is about many options. It’s just that the person who uses this fallacy cannot think of them or is using it as an intimidation technique.

In one of the famous comedy sketches of radio comedian Jack Benny, a robber accosts him and says, “Your money or your life.” Benny would pause, look at the audience, put his right hand to his check and say, “Well…..”

.
4. Professor Geo’s “Communication Thought of the Week #5:
American poet Adrienne Rich reminds us that “Lying is done with words and also with silence.”

5. .A Note to Communicators:

“Money Issues”
The quotations above are only a tiny fraction of the number of opinions about money from the dawn of time to the present moment. Both the lack of money and the excess of money can pose problems for many people. Money, like Mark Twain’s weather, is something people talk about, but do nothing about it.

Why is money talked about so much? We need to identify the several levels on which money operates.

  • There’s the concrete level – the area which can be measured.
o How much is in your pocket now?
o Do you have enough money to pay your bills?
o How much is in your bank account?
o The amount of money has no connection to self-worth
  • Then there’s the psychological level – the associations people bring to money.
o I am a failure when I have no money.
o I am a success when I have lots of money.
o I need more money because I am afraid of failure.
o I need more money because I have to prove I am superior to everyone else.
o I believe money buys happiness.
o When I have money, I feel powerful. Etc.
  • Then there’s the symbolic level – what money represents to the individual and to society.
o Lots of money equals power and influence
o Little or no money equals poverty and indigence
There’s the billionaire’s view of money, quoted by Donald Trump above. “Money is a way of keeping score” in the win/lose game of money.

Wealth or the lack of it is, I believe, a state of mind. If one is focused on externals – things, position, power – then money is an important barometer of success. This person has an external locus of control. Objects and rank are markers for success. Society conditions us, like Pavlovian dogs, to go shopping. Or as one student told me the other day, “I just came back from shopping therapy.”
If one is focused on internal values – an internal locus of control – then money is unlikely to rule thoughts of external success. The internal measures of success are set by the individual’s goals, not society’s.

To identify and establish one’s own internal values - and act on them productively – is a constant challenge. For the most part, external values seem to be the norm while internal values are invisible and cannot be measured by external tools.

Someone like a religious ascetic or a nun or monk in a monastery withdraws from the external world to contemplate internal values. There are few distractions in an environment of reduced stimulation.

Most of us try to balance our internal with our external values in the street world of money and power. It is a difficult juggling act and sacrifices have to be made. Often someone is hurt.
From exploring what money represents to each of us we can learn much. Like any universal symbol – the bris, the bar/bas mitzvah, the wedding ring, the funeral – money carries many layers of meaning, different for each of us.

Next time you want to have an unpredictable conversation, ask, “What do you think about money?” Be prepared.

6. Next week’s Conversation:
Critical Listening Institute II – Maurice Ravel’s “Bolero”
In this second session of our effort to sharpen our listening skills, we turn to a famous piece of music, a one-movement orchestral piece by French composer Maurice Ravel, premiered in 1928. “Bolero” gained universal attention when it was commandeered for the 1979 Blake Edwards comedy, “10” starring Dudley Moore, Bo Derek and Julie Andrews. We are going to listen to the piece twice, once for a general impression followed by a discussion. Then we close with a second hearing. It should be fun to understand how the structure of this particular piece of music created such notoriety.

7. UPCOMING CONVERSATIONS:

What about one of these topics?
“Repetition”
“Meaning”
“Why Does History Repeat Itself?”
“Heroism”
“Concentration”
“Coping with Adversity”
Student Poetry showcase
“Empathy”
“Connecting the Dots”
Role play of Cynical people
“Cold Calling in Sales
“He’s Just Not That into You”
Critical Listening Institute III: “Abbott & Costello’s ‘Who’s On First?’”
“Criticism – Giving and Receiving”
“Logical Fallacies”
“Freedom II”
Faculty Colloquy I: T.S. Eliot’s “The Waste Land”
presented by Professor Carlisle Yearwood
“Gender Communication II”
“SPAR Debate”
“Distraction II”
“Negotiation II”
“Imagination II”
“Rodney King: ‘Can’t We Just Get Along?’ II”
“Political Savvy”
“Emotions: Anger II”
“Capitalism and Socialism”
And dozens of others!

Compare the notice of the session with what really happened!

9. What happened on Wednesday, November 3, 2010?
“The 2010 Midterm Election Results”

We are changing this week’s topic to the most heated subject in the news these days. What will happen on Tuesday, November 2, 2010? By the time we have this discussion we’ll know the winners and losers. This year’s elections are remarkable for several reasons::*the emergence of a divisive Tea Party which has so many aspects it is hard to get a handle on its position(s); * the diminished power of the Republican party as it has been seemingly dominated by the Tea Party; *the dubious influence of President Obama on the Democratic candidates; *the timid nature of the Democrats to brag about their accomplishments in the last two years; * the importance of money and media in the election; * and the coarsening of the political dialogue between candidates where opinions become facts and facts are invented. For Communicators to cast an informed vote, you really have to sharpen your critical thinking and listening skills. There is so much to learn about Communication and the lack of it just a casual observer of what’s going on.
MAKE SURE YOU VOTE ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 2!

Two new faces, Moche Bengio and Matthew Nwozuzu, joined Steve Gradman and Ian Smith who hadn’t visited in a while. Familiar participants included Markus Vayndorf, Richard Green, Mathew Mattocks, Charles Mason, Hal Wicke and one young woman whose name I could not decipher on the sign in list.

As expected, there were many divided opinions about yesterday’s elections. Several thought Obama deserved to lose, but others reminded them that the election was not about Obama but about the House and Senate. Yet several people felt that what Obama did or did not do influenced the election.

Moche, born in France, felt that “politics is a game.” Demonstrating his extensive knowledge of British, French and European government, he felt that America’s legislative structure produces its own difficulties.

The success of British Prime Minister, Tony Blair, was that he was able to be all things to all people. People called him, “Bush’s Poodle.”

There was an extended discussion about capitalism and socialism and the roles both belief systems play in American government. The topic was so juicy that we will have a stand-alone conversation about both points of view.

Another extensive discussion focused on the Tea Party as a new force in American politics. We tried to define what it was.

We also noted how many Tea Partiers were women – Sarah Palin, Christine O’Donnell, Michele Bachman, Sharron Angle – versus more typical Republican women like Meg Whitman and Carly Fiorina.

Leadership is about the ordering of priorities. Was Obama tactically wrong to push for healthcare before jobs? Most people thought it was and that was a major cause of the Democrats losing the House.

Other topics were briefly touched on: Glenn Beck, Liberal media (MSNBC) vs Conservative media (Fox), Libertarianism, the impact of political advertising because of the Citizen’s United decision of the Supreme Court.

Finally, Hal asked, “What is the one trait you look for in a political candidate? The answers were revealing:

2 -One who keeps the people in mind.
1- One who is intelligent.
2 -One who has a plan.
1 -One who has poise – JFK’s “Grace under pressure.”
1 – Competence
1 - Pass
---
We always have a great time exploring these issues. So often our daily life never focuses on these Communication issues. If you have something you want us to discuss please let us know and we’ll add it to the list.

Next time bring a friend. The Communication Club is always an open discussion, limited only by time. Everyone gets a chance to speak. All opinions are welcome. Here is an opportunity for students to challenge professors’ views outside the class without any homework or assignments. You just have to show up and listen and talk if you want.

Hal Wicke

Tuesday, November 2, 2010

The Touro Communication Club Notes - #126–October 27, 2010
Contents:
1. Five Quotes about “Politics and Elections”
Change of program!
2. UPCOMING CLUB PROGRAM: - “Midterm Elections 2010”
Wednesday, October 20, 2010 @ 2 pm in Room 223
3. Logical Fallacy of the Week # 15 – “ The Bandwagon Fallacy”
4. Professor Geo’s “Communication Thought of the Week”
5. Note to Communicators: “In Politics, We Get What We Deserve”
6. .NEXT WEEK’S TOPIC “Money”
7. Upcoming Conversations - please add your topic to the list
8. What happened last week: ““Civility”
1. Seven Delicious Quotes about Politics
Democracy means simply the bludgeoning of the people by the people for the people.”.
Oscar Wilde, (1854-1900), Irish poet, novelist, dramatist and critic.
“Any 20-year-old who isn’t a liberal doesn’t have a heart, and any 40-year-old who isn’t a conservative doesn’t have a brain.”
Attributed to Sir Winston Churchill (1874-1965), British politician and statesman known
for his leadership of the United Kingdom during the World War II.
“If you want something said, ask a man. If you want something done, ask a woman.”
Margaret Thatcher (b. 1925, British politician and Prime Minister
“Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it, misdiagnosing it and then misapplying
the wrong remedies.”
Groucho Marx (1890-1977), American comedian, actor and “singer”
“Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by
those who are dumber.”
Plato (425BCE-348 BCE), Ancient Greek Philosopher
Politics is supposed to be the second oldest profession. I have come to realize
that it bears a very close resemblance to the first."
Ronald Reagan (1911-2004), 40th American President (1981-1989
“Politics is not the art of the possible. It consists in choosing between the disastrous
and the unpalatable.”
John Kenneth Galbraith (1908-2006), American economist and diplomat
2. The Touro Communication Club
Wednesday, November 3, 2010 - 2 pm – Room 223 – Midtown
“The 2010 Midterm Election Results”
We are changing this week’s topic to the most heated subject in the news these days. What will happen on Tuesday, November 2, 2010? By the time we have this discussion we’ll know the winners and losers. This year’s elections are remarkable for several reasons::*the emergence of a divisive Tea Party which has so many aspects it is hard to get a handle on its position(s); * the diminished power of the Republican party as it has been seemingly dominated by the Tea Party; *the dubious influence of President Obama on the Democratic candidates; *the timid nature of the Democrats to brag about their accomplishments in the last two years; * the importance of money and media in the election; * and the coarsening of the political dialogue between candidates where opinions become facts and facts are invented. For Communicators to cast an informed vote, you really have to sharpen your critical thinking and listening skills. There is so much to learn about Communication and the lack of it just a casual observer of what’s going on.
MAKE SURE YOU VOTE ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 2!
3. Logical Fallacy of the Week #16:
“Appeal to Emotion”
With just a few days to go before Tuesday, November 2nd, the
Midterm Elections have reached a fever pitch. Both parties plus the new Tea Party are dumping everything they can into an unprecedented a media blitz fueled by bags of money from all measure of individual and new corporate sources.
In such a heated campaign, all pretense to logical and rationality virtually disappears. When reason disappears, our emotional nature runs amok without any guidance system. The candidates become hoarse in their shouting to their slogans. The speakers whip their audiences into the fervor of a mob in their attempts to persuade their supporters to their side and, more importantly, motivate them to vote.
Theatrical strategies like banners, marching bands, patriotic tunes, buckets of thanks to everyone, booming sound systems are among the techniques to create and build emotion. Observe the similarity between 2010 elections and the films of Adolf Hitler haranguing his Nuremberg audiences in 1935. There is a frightening similarity. With different tools, a horror picture or a movie thriller manipulates its audiences to capture its audiences.
All kinds of logical fallacies reappear again and again. Name calling (Ad Hominum) is always a favorite. Making dubious statements (Slippery Slope) compete with each other. Labeling (Vague abstractions (Glittering Generalities) are standard tools. “Take Back Our Country!” “Change We Can Believe In!” are choice slogans, representative each side.
Even with an awareness of how the media and the candidates manipulate their audiences to get them to vote, we can get drawn into the emotional excitement. It remains a constant challenge to every individual to operate in the emotional world and the world of reason at the same time.
In his poem, “If,” Kipling asks his young mentor “If you can keep your head when all about you are losing theirs…”, then he – we - can function effectively in this hurly burly world.

4. Professor Geo’s “Communication Thought of the Week #3:
Epictetus (AD 55-AD 135) reminds us, “We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.”
5. .A Note to Communicators:
Is Civility An Impossibility?
Sometimes I wonder. I suppose if I took a view of the several millennia, perhaps. You might argue there is some improvement in civility when we move from animal skins for clothes to Gucci and Northface. We don’t burn witches any more in America that I know of, but the threat of stoning is prevalent in other parts of the world.
The targeting of minority for discrimination seems to have changed. Historically, Jews have been the personification of scapegoating, which reached its ultimate horror in the Holocaust. Yet discrimination remains – more clever, less immediately visible.
In America, blacks have moved from outright discrimination with slavery to subtler institutional racism. Since the 2008 Presidential election, racism has taken on other costumes – denial of legitimacy, the refusal to cooperate, the invention of facts, among other masks.
Women remain a target for uncivil behavior. Despite passage of the 19th Amendment in 1920 and the women’s liberation movement of the 1970s, women’s rights continue to be challenged through exclusion and wage discrimination. Women’s rights are an international issue as well.
Human kind seems not to want to give up its instinct to diminish those who we think are less than we are. Reaction boils over when these minority groups seek equality. Asians, gays, Arabs, Mexicans are just the latest groups who are different who are on someone’s short list to discredit.
Even being “P.C.” (politically correct) has limited long term impact. Yes, we’ve added “Ms” to our vocabulary, but not much more.
The criterion for incivility remains the same: Any person who is different from me is a potential target.
· If I am male, the female is fair game. Tradition says the male must prevail; the woman is inferior.
· If I am white, someone who is a different color can be a target.
· If I am straight, my discomfort with someone with a different sexual orientation can lead to violence.
· If I believe in one religion, a person of another faith is automatically suspicious.
· If I am American, my culture is the best and I will do my best to Americanize the world – and make a few bucks in the process.
The tactics of communicating incivility remain the same.
· Labeling and other ad hominum behavior is an early tool of incivility.
· Avoidance, isolation and shunning are informal strategies.
· Ghettoizing the minority – redlining real estate - becomes a more formal technique.
· The creation of myths about the minority which become stereotypes are clever devices.
· Intimidation tactics like fire-bombing and burning crosses are effective tools.
· Negative phone calls and now threatening emails are among the technological tools.
With the recent suicide of Rutgers’ student Tyler Climenti off the George Washington Bridge, a new form of incivility – cyber bullying – raises incivility to a new level.
In the short term, I am beginning to think civility is an impossibility. Nobel laureate William Golding’s 1954 allegory, “Lord of the Flies,” is a not so unrealistic example of man’s inhumanity to man.
So do we give up? “Denzel Washington’s “The Book of Eli” offers a dreadful future for civilization.
Or do we adopt the Sisyphistic view of doing our best to create a civil society with baby steps. The “Chinese water torture” strategy is my strategy for changing our immediate uncivil environment – Drip, drip, drip.
Then teach people to pay it forward. If you’ve learned anything, then teach two other people to do the same.
6. Next week’s Conversation:
“Money”
Wednesday, November 3, 2010, 2 pm, Room 223- Midtown.
Expect this topic to promote lots of heat. Although money is often invisible in many of our daily activities, its presence or lack of it can provoke the most extreme human behavior. Money can be a measure of self-esteem, a tool for measuring accomplishment, a springboard for greed, a sacrament of poverty, a replacement for love, and on and on. Everyone has a different relationship to money which may be conscious or not. Let’s start the discussion with “The love of money is the root of all evil.”
7. UPCOMING CONVERSATIONS:
What about one of these topics?
“Repetition”
“Meaning”
“Why Does History Repeat Itself?”
“Heroism”
“Concentration”
“Coping with Adversity”
Student Poetry showcase
“Empathy”
“Connecting the Dots”
Role play of Cynical people
“Cold Calling in Sales
“He’s Just Not That into You”
Critical Listening Institute II – Maurice Ravel’s “Bolero”
Critical Listening Institute III: “Abbott & Costello’s ‘Who’s On First?’”
“Criticism – Giving and Receiving”
“Logical Fallacies”
“Freedom II”
Faculty Colloquy I: T.S. Eliot’s “The Waste Land”
presented by Professor Carlisle Yearwood
“Gender Communication II”
“SPAR Debate”
“Distraction II”
“Negotiation II”
“Imagination II”
“Rodney King: ‘Can’t We Just Get Along?’ II”
“Political Savvy”
“Emotions: Anger II”
And dozens of others!
Compare the notice of the session with what really happened!
9. What happened on Wednesday, October 27, 2010?
“Civility”
Since the 2008 Presidential election, civility has been in the news. People shouting at one another at town meetings. Certain cable news attacking each other, using ad hominum language. The President being called a "liar” during his Congressional presentation. Attacks on Islam with the almost burning of the4 Qu’ran. Hate crimes such as the video that caused the suicide death of Rutgers’ student Tyler Climenti who jumped off the George Washington Bridge recently.
A large crowd of over 20 people participated in this extremely valuable film and discussion. Newcomers, many from Touro’s DMX program, included Floralba Leomeli, Jeannette Febus, Gabriela Rassi, Shamir Plummer, Natalie Scarborough, Emmanuel Shemilov, Lettie Lachirca, Robert Gilmore, Jamal James, Tan Smith, Marcus Bryant, Ajenis Mercedes, Peter Bryan, Steve roman, Cassandra Deen, Alan Steinberg.
Familiar faces included Yi Cai, Pamela Shephard, Carlisle Yearwood, Lorinda Moore, Rich Cohen. Sara Tabaei, Carneil May, Richard Green and Hal Wicke.
Our special guests were Ben Barenholtz, the filmmaker, jazz drummer Bob Schuller (son of Gunther Schuller, one of the later moving forces of the Music Inn who appeared in the film as an infant and young child) and Vladimir Spitzberg, of the DMX program, who made the program happen.
Hal introduced Vladimir who in turn introduced Ben Barenholtz. Ben spoke for a few minutes about his involvement in the film and introduced Bob Schuller, a live “artifact” of the years of the Music Inn.
Using archive film footage, stills and interviews the hour-long film recounted the founding vision of Music Inn in Lenox, Massachusetts, its attraction of seminal folk and jazz luminaries, its growth into a virtual commercial enterprise in competition with Tanglewood, the venerated classical music festival.
Concluding its final years with the establishment of a music school, the 10-year life of the Music Inn from 1950-1960 became an almost forgotten experience without the efforts of both Schuller and Barenholtz.
The film included performances and comments of folk singer of Pete Seeger as well as Jazz icons of Louis Armstrong, Dizzy Gillespie, Dave Brubeck, Mahalia Jackson, Sarah Vaughan among many others.
The documentary has yet to be released because of music releases that are necessary for commercial distribution of the DVD. There are over 100 hours of film footage which both Ben and Bob indicated could make several films.
Following the film, Ben talked further about his involvement as did Bob, who served as off-camera interviewer of many of the historical figures in the film. Asked about what he was thinking as he watched the video, Ben said he was thinking of ways to further edit the film.
As Ben pointed out, the most important statement in the film was jazz great Charlie Mingus’ exclamation, “Finally, we have roots!”
One student exclaimed, “I didn’t know this existed! I was boggled.” Another student asked about jazz performer Josh White’s interest in rap and hip hop.
The entire session was an inspiring experience, providing an almost lost fragment of American music history. With this documentary, Ben Barenholtz has provided a vibrant record of the most innovative American art form for future generations to understand.
---
We always have a great time exploring these issues. So often our daily life never focuses on these Communication issues. If you have something you want us to discuss please let us know and we’ll add it to the list.
Next time bring a friend. The Communication Club is always an open discussion, limited only by time. Everyone gets a chance to speak. All opinions are welcome. Here is an opportunity for students to challenge professors’ views outside the class without any homework or assignments. You just have to show up and listen and talk if you want.